web-dev-qa-db-fra.com

Comment regrouper les éléments d'un tableau dans Swift

Disons que j'ai ce code:

class Stat {
   var statEvents : [StatEvents] = []
}

struct StatEvents {
   var name: String
   var date: String
   var hours: Int
}


var currentStat = Stat()

currentStat.statEvents = [
   StatEvents(name: "lunch", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1),
   StatEvents(name: "dinner", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1),
   StatEvents(name: "dinner", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1),
   StatEvents(name: "lunch", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1),
   StatEvents(name: "dinner", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1)
]

var filteredArray1 : [StatEvents] = []
var filteredArray2 : [StatEvents] = []

Je pourrais appeler autant de fois manuellement la fonction suivante pour avoir 2 tableaux groupés par "même nom".

filteredArray1 = currentStat.statEvents.filter({$0.name == "dinner"})
filteredArray2 = currentStat.statEvents.filter({$0.name == "lunch"})

Le problème est que je ne connaitrai pas la valeur de la variable, dans ce cas "dîner" et "déjeuner", je voudrais donc regrouper automatiquement ce tableau de statEvents, de manière à obtenir autant de tableaux que le nom change.

Comment pourrais-je faire ça?

iosarraysswiftnsarray
48
Ruben

Swift 4:

Depuis Swift 4, cette fonctionnalité est ajoutée à la bibliothèque standard } _. Vous pouvez l'utiliser comme ceci:

Dictionary(grouping: statEvents, by: { $0.name })
[
  "dinner": [
    StatEvents(name: "dinner", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1),
    StatEvents(name: "dinner", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1),
    StatEvents(name: "dinner", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1)
  ],
  "lunch": [
    StatEvents(name: "lunch", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1),
    StatEvents(name: "lunch", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1)
]

Swift 3:

public extension Sequence {
    func group<U: Hashable>(by key: (Iterator.Element) -> U) -> [U:[Iterator.Element]] {
        var categories: [U: [Iterator.Element]] = [:]
        for element in self {
            let key = key(element)
            if case nil = categories[key]?.append(element) {
                categories[key] = [element]
            }
        }
        return categories
    }
}

Malheureusement, la fonction append ci-dessus copie le tableau sous-jacent au lieu de le muter, ce qui serait préférable. _ { Cela provoque un ralentissement assez important }. Vous pouvez contourner le problème en utilisant un wrapper de type référence:

class Box<A> {
  var value: A
  init(_ val: A) {
    self.value = val
  }
}

public extension Sequence {
  func group<U: Hashable>(by key: (Iterator.Element) -> U) -> [U:[Iterator.Element]] {
    var categories: [U: Box<[Iterator.Element]>] = [:]
    for element in self {
      let key = key(element)
      if case nil = categories[key]?.value.append(element) {
        categories[key] = Box([element])
      }
    }
    var result: [U: [Iterator.Element]] = Dictionary(minimumCapacity: categories.count)
    for (key,val) in categories {
      result[key] = val.value
    }
    return result
  }
}

Même si vous parcourez le dictionnaire final deux fois, cette version est toujours plus rapide que l’original dans la plupart des cas.

Swift 2:

public extension SequenceType {

  /// Categorises elements of self into a dictionary, with the keys given by keyFunc

  func categorise<U : Hashable>(@noescape keyFunc: Generator.Element -> U) -> [U:[Generator.Element]] {
    var dict: [U:[Generator.Element]] = [:]
    for el in self {
      let key = keyFunc(el)
      if case nil = dict[key]?.append(el) { dict[key] = [el] }
    }
    return dict
  }
}

Dans votre cas, vous pourriez avoir les "clés" retournées par keyFunc être les noms:

currentStat.statEvents.categorise { $0.name }
[  
  dinner: [
    StatEvents(name: "dinner", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1),
    StatEvents(name: "dinner", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1),
    StatEvents(name: "dinner", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1)
  ], lunch: [
    StatEvents(name: "lunch", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1),
    StatEvents(name: "lunch", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1)
  ]
]

Vous obtiendrez ainsi un dictionnaire, où chaque clé est un nom et chaque valeur est un tableau des StatEvents portant ce nom.

Swift 1

func categorise<S : SequenceType, U : Hashable>(seq: S, @noescape keyFunc: S.Generator.Element -> U) -> [U:[S.Generator.Element]] {
  var dict: [U:[S.Generator.Element]] = [:]
  for el in seq {
    let key = keyFunc(el)
    dict[key] = (dict[key] ?? []) + [el]
  }
  return dict
}

categorise(currentStat.statEvents) { $0.name }

Ce qui donne la sortie:

extension StatEvents : Printable {
  var description: String {
    return "\(self.name): \(self.date)"
  }
}
print(categorise(currentStat.statEvents) { $0.name })
[
  dinner: [
    dinner: 01-01-2015,
    dinner: 01-01-2015,
    dinner: 01-01-2015
  ], lunch: [
    lunch: 01-01-2015,
    lunch: 01-01-2015
  ]
]

(Le swiftstub est ici _)

108
oisdk

Avec Swift 4, Dictionary dispose d'une méthode d'initialisation appelée init(grouping:by:) . init(grouping:by:) a la déclaration suivante:

init<S>(grouping values: S, by keyForValue: (S.Element) throws -> Key) rethrows where Value == [S.Element], S : Sequence

Crée un nouveau dictionnaire dans lequel les clés sont les groupes renvoyés par la fermeture donnée et les valeurs sont des tableaux d'éléments qui ont renvoyé chaque clé spécifique.

Le code de terrain de jeu suivant montre comment utiliser init(grouping:by:) afin de résoudre votre problème:

struct StatEvents: CustomStringConvertible {

    let name: String
    let date: String
    let hours: Int

    var description: String {
        return "Event: \(name) - \(date) - \(hours)"
    }

}

let statEvents = [
    StatEvents(name: "lunch", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1),
    StatEvents(name: "dinner", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1),
    StatEvents(name: "lunch", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1),
    StatEvents(name: "dinner", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1)
]

let predicate = { (element: StatEvents) in
    return element.name
}

let dictionary = Dictionary(grouping: statEvents, by: predicate)
print(dictionary)
/*
prints:
[
    "dinner": [Event: dinner - 01-01-2015 - 1, Event: dinner - 01-01-2015 - 1],
    "lunch": [Event: lunch - 01-01-2015 - 1, Event: lunch - 01-01-2015 - 1]
]
*/
39
Imanou Petit

Swift 4: vous pouvez utiliser init (regroupement: par :) à partir de site de développement Apple

Exemple:

let students = ["Kofi", "Abena", "Efua", "Kweku", "Akosua"]
let studentsByLetter = Dictionary(grouping: students, by: { $0.first! })
// ["E": ["Efua"], "K": ["Kofi", "Kweku"], "A": ["Abena", "Akosua"]]

Donc dans ton cas 

   let dictionary = Dictionary(grouping: currentStat.statEvents, by:  { $0.name! })
26
Mihuilk

Pour Swift 3:

public extension Sequence {
    func categorise<U : Hashable>(_ key: (Iterator.Element) -> U) -> [U:[Iterator.Element]] {
        var dict: [U:[Iterator.Element]] = [:]
        for el in self {
            let key = key(el)
            if case nil = dict[key]?.append(el) { dict[key] = [el] }
        }
        return dict
    }
}

Usage:

currentStat.statEvents.categorise { $0.name }
[  
  dinner: [
    StatEvents(name: "dinner", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1),
    StatEvents(name: "dinner", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1),
    StatEvents(name: "dinner", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1)
  ], lunch: [
    StatEvents(name: "lunch", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1),
    StatEvents(name: "lunch", date: "01-01-2015", hours: 1)
  ]
]
25
mientus

Dans Swift 4, cette extension offre les meilleures performances et aide à chaîner vos opérateurs

extension Sequence {
    func group<U: Hashable>(by key: (Iterator.Element) -> U) -> [U:[Iterator.Element]] {
        return Dictionary.init(grouping: self, by: key)
    }
}

Exemple:

struct Asset {
    let coin: String
    let amount: Int
}

let assets = [
    Asset(coin: "BTC", amount: 12),
    Asset(coin: "ETH", amount: 15),
    Asset(coin: "BTC", amount: 30),
]
let grouped = assets.group(by: { $0.coin })

crée:

[
    "ETH": [
        Asset(coin: "ETH", amount: 15)
    ],
    "BTC": [
        Asset(coin: "BTC", amount: 12),
        Asset(coin: "BTC", amount: 30)
    ]
]
5
duan

Swift 4 

struct Foo {
  let fizz: String
  let buzz: Int
}

let foos: [Foo] = [Foo(fizz: "a", buzz: 1), 
                   Foo(fizz: "b", buzz: 2), 
                   Foo(fizz: "a", buzz: 3),
                  ]
// use foos.lazy.map instead of foos.map to avoid allocating an
// intermediate Array. We assume the Dictionary simply needs the
// mapped values and not an actual Array
let foosByFizz: [String: Foo] = 
    Dictionary(foos.lazy.map({ ($0.fizz, $0)}, 
               uniquingKeysWith: { (lhs: Foo, rhs: Foo) in
                   // Arbitrary business logic to pick a Foo from
                   // two that have duplicate fizz-es
                   return lhs.buzz > rhs.buzz ? lhs : rhs
               })
// We don't need a uniquing closure for buzz because we know our buzzes are unique
let foosByBuzz: [String: Foo] = 
    Dictionary(uniqueKeysWithValues: foos.lazy.map({ ($0.buzz, $0)})
2
Heath Borders

Vous pouvez également grouper par KeyPath, comme ceci:

public extension Sequence {
    func group<Key>(by keyPath: KeyPath<Element, Key>) -> [Key: [Element]] where Key: Hashable {
        return Dictionary(grouping: self, by: {
            $0[keyPath: keyPath]
        })
    }
}

En utilisant l'exemple crypto de @ duan:

struct Asset {
    let coin: String
    let amount: Int
}

let assets = [
    Asset(coin: "BTC", amount: 12),
    Asset(coin: "ETH", amount: 15),
    Asset(coin: "BTC", amount: 30),
]

Alors l'utilisation ressemble à ceci: 

let grouped = assets.group(by: \.coin)

Cédant le même résultat:

[
    "ETH": [
        Asset(coin: "ETH", amount: 15)
    ],
    "BTC": [
        Asset(coin: "BTC", amount: 12),
        Asset(coin: "BTC", amount: 30)
    ]
]
1
Sajjon

Hey, si vous avez besoin de garder l’ordre en regroupant des éléments au lieu du dictionnaire de hachage, j’ai utilisé des n-uplets et gardé l’ordre de la liste pendant le regroupement. 

extension Sequence
{
   func zmGroup<U : Hashable>(by: (Element) -> U) -> [(U,[Element])]
   {
       var groupCategorized: [(U,[Element])] = []
       for item in self {
           let groupKey = by(item)
           guard let index = groupCategorized.index(where: { $0.0 == groupKey }) else { groupCategorized.append((groupKey, [item])); continue }
           groupCategorized[index].1.append(item)
       }
       return groupCategorized
   }
}
0
Suat KARAKUSOGLU

Thr Dictionary (grouping: arr) est si facile!

 func groupArr(arr: [PendingCamera]) {

    let groupDic = Dictionary(grouping: arr) { (pendingCamera) -> DateComponents in
        print("group arr: \(String(describing: pendingCamera.date))")

        let date = Calendar.current.dateComponents([.day, .year, .month], from: (pendingCamera.date)!)

        return date
    }

    var cams = [[PendingCamera]]()

    groupDic.keys.forEach { (key) in
        print(key)
        let values = groupDic[key]
        print(values ?? "")

        cams.append(values ?? [])
    }
    print(" cams are \(cams)")

    self.groupdArr = cams
}
0
ironRoei

Voici mon approche basée sur Tuple pour maintenir l'ordre tout en utilisant Swift 4 KeyPath en tant que comparateur de groupe:

extension Sequence{

    func group<T:Comparable>(by:KeyPath<Element,T>) -> [(key:T,values:[Element])]{

        return self.reduce([]){(accumulator, element) in

            var accumulator = accumulator
            var result :(key:T,values:[Element]) = accumulator.first(where:{ $0.key == element[keyPath:by]}) ?? (key: element[keyPath:by], values:[])
            result.values.append(element)
            if let index = accumulator.index(where: { $0.key == element[keyPath: by]}){
                accumulator.remove(at: index)
            }
            accumulator.append(result)

            return accumulator
        }
    }
}

Exemple d'utilisation:

struct Company{
    let name : String
    let type : String
}

struct Employee{
    let name : String
    let surname : String
    let company: Company
}

let employees : [Employee] = [...]
let companies : [Company] = [...]

employees.group(by: \Employee.company.type) // or
employees.group(by: \Employee.surname) // or
companies.group(by: \Company.type)
0
Zell B.

Étendre la réponse acceptée pour autoriser ordonné grouper:

extension Sequence {
    func group<GroupingType: Hashable>(by key: (Iterator.Element) -> GroupingType) -> [[Iterator.Element]] {
        var groups: [GroupingType: [Iterator.Element]] = [:]
        var groupsOrder: [GroupingType] = []
        forEach { element in
            let key = key(element)
            if case nil = groups[key]?.append(element) {
                groups[key] = [element]
                groupsOrder.append(key)
            }
        }
        return groupsOrder.map { groups[$0]! }
    }
}

Ensuite, cela fonctionnera sur n'importe quel Tuple :

let a = [(grouping: 10, content: "a"),
         (grouping: 20, content: "b"),
         (grouping: 10, content: "c")]
print(a.group { $0.grouping })

Ainsi que toute struct ou classe :

struct GroupInt {
    var grouping: Int
    var content: String
}
let b = [GroupInt(grouping: 10, content: "a"),
         GroupInt(grouping: 20, content: "b"),
         GroupInt(grouping: 10, content: "c")]
print(b.group { $0.grouping })
0
Cœur